Showing posts with label Environment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Environment. Show all posts

Australia’s Dirtiest Coal Power Plant in 2025

Dirtiest Coal Power Plant in Australia to Close

Australia has long relied on coal-fired power to keep its lights on, but in 2025 the debate around dirty coal power plants is louder than ever. Rising carbon emissions, international climate pressure, and the growth of renewable energy have put certain plants in the spotlight as the nation’s worst polluters.

Why Coal Power Plants Are Called “Dirty”

Coal power is one of the highest-emitting sources of carbon dioxide (CO₂), sulfur dioxide (SO₂), and nitrogen oxides (NOx). These emissions contribute to:

  • Greenhouse gases driving climate change

  • Air pollution that causes respiratory illness

  • Acid rain and environmental damage

When analysts rank plants as “dirtiest,” they usually measure emissions intensity (CO₂ per megawatt-hour produced) and total annual output.

The Dirtiest Coal Plant in Australia

As of 2025, reports from environmental watchdogs continue to identify AGL’s Loy Yang A power station in Victoria’s Latrobe Valley as one of the dirtiest coal plants in the country.

  • Fuel: Brown coal (lignite), among the most polluting types

  • Capacity: ~2,200 MW

  • Emissions: Estimated at 15–18 million tonnes of CO₂ annually

  • Notable fact: Consistently ranks in the top 10 dirtiest coal plants worldwide in emissions intensity

Another frequent entry on “dirtiest plant” lists is Yallourn Power Station, also in Victoria, which has been criticized for older infrastructure and high emissions levels.

Top 5 Dirtiest Coal Power Plants in Australia (2025)

Rank Power Station Location (State) Capacity (MW) Emission Intensity* (t CO₂-e/MWh) Planned Closure Year
1 Yallourn Power Station Victoria (Latrobe Valley) ~1,480 MW ~1.33 2028
2 Loy Yang A Power Station Victoria (Latrobe Valley) ~2,200 MW ~1.17 2035
3 Loy Yang B Power Station Victoria (Latrobe Valley) ~1,050 MW ~1.14 2046–47
4 Gladstone Power Station Queensland ~1,680 MW ~0.95 TBD
5 Eraring Power Station New South Wales ~2,880 MW ~0.87 2025+ (under review)

* Emission Intensity = tonnes of CO₂ equivalent per megawatt-hour generated — a key measure of how “dirty” the plant is.

Impact on Australia’s Energy Mix

Despite being a wealthy nation with vast renewable potential, Australia still gets about 50–55% of its electricity from coal in 2025. The dirtiest plants persist because:

  • Low cost of brown coal in regions like Victoria

  • Legacy grid infrastructure built around coal

  • Slow political consensus on energy transition

Government Policy and Phase-Out Plans

Australia’s federal and state governments have pledged to cut emissions and accelerate renewable adoption. For example:

  • Loy Yang A is currently scheduled to close by 2035, though environmental groups are pushing for an earlier date.

  • Yallourn’s operator has announced closure by 2028.

  • Eraring in NSW was planned to shut down in 2025 but may be extended due to grid reliability concerns.

  • National targets aim for 82% clean energy by 2030, meaning coal’s role will shrink significantly.

The Future: Renewables vs Coal

With the rapid rise of solar farms, wind farms, and battery storage, the economics of coal look weaker every year. Communities that once depended on coal jobs are transitioning toward clean energy industries.

Still, the dirtiest coal power plants remain in operation, balancing grid reliability until storage solutions scale up. This tension defines Australia’s current energy debate.

Key Takeaways

  • Yallourn and Loy Yang A are the dirtiest coal plants in Australia by emissions intensity.

  • These plants emit millions of tonnes of CO₂ annually, contributing heavily to climate change.

  • Closure dates are set, but there is uncertainty around timelines due to energy demand pressures.

  • Renewables are scaling quickly, but coal remains a stubborn backbone of Australia’s grid—for now.

The Mississippi River: Navigating the Environmental Impacts of Hydro Dams

The Mississippi River, often romanticized for its historic significance and natural beauty, faces a modern-day dilemma exacerbated by human intervention: the proliferation of hydroelectric dams. These structures, once heralded as symbols of progress and renewable energy, now pose significant environmental challenges to one of America's most iconic waterways. In this article, we explore the impact of hydro dams on the Mississippi River and the urgent need to address their consequences for the health of the river and its surrounding ecosystems.

The Impact of Erin Brockovich on Various Communities

The Major Accomplishments of Erin Brockovich

Impact of Cavitating Pipes at Lake Powell Glen Canyon Dam

Understanding the Impact of Cavitating Pipes at Glen Canyon Dam

The recent memo from the Bureau of Reclamation regarding damage to Glen Canyon Dam's infrastructure, specifically the cavitating pipes, raises significant concerns about the future of water management along the Colorado River. Let's delve into what cavitating pipes are and why they pose a critical problem for Lake Powell and the downstream water supply. 

Propane vs. Natural Gas Power Plants: A Comprehensive Comparison

There were more natural gas power plants worldwide compared to propane power plants. Natural gas is a more abundant and widely used fuel for power generation due to its relatively lower emissions and cost compared to other fossil fuels.  Propane, on the other hand, is commonly used as a fuel for smaller, distributed power generation systems or in specific applications where it may be more convenient or practical than natural gas.

Propane and natural gas are both commonly used as fuel sources for various applications, including heating, cooking, and powering certain appliances. They are distinct gases with different properties, sources, and characteristics. Here's a comparison of propane vs. natural gas:

Here are some differences between propane and natural gas power plants:

Are Power Plants Bad For The Environment?

Power plants can have both positive and negative impacts on the environment, depending on various factors such as the type of power plant, its fuel source, and the technologies used for emissions control. Here are some considerations:

How To Add Power Plant Maps Shortcut To Your Phone

Power Plant Maps Mobile Web App

Mobile app to find coal, gas, and nuclear power plant health and safety issues.  Map of power plants,  pollution, environment & community issues.  Progressive web app maps like ours are the wave of the future and don't require downloads like native phone apps. 

How you add our web app to your iPhone home screen:

What Chemicals Are Typically in Coal Ash Ponds?

coal ash pond satellite view

Coal ash ponds typically contain a range of chemical constituents, which can vary depending on the composition of the coal burned, the type of power plant, and the specific processes used. Here are some of the chemicals commonly found in coal ash ponds:

Explosion at Coal Fire-Fired Oak Grove Power Plant in Texas

coal fired boiler

Tragically, a contractor lost their life on Wednesday morning due to an explosion at the Oak Grove Power Plant near Franklin. 

Power Plant Air & Water Pollution

power plant pollution

Power plants are a significant source of air and water pollution. 

Coal Ash Dumping Ponds Heat Map

coal ash ponds heat map

Where Are The Coal Ash Dumping Locations from Power Plants?

Duke Energy Coal Ash Dumping Mess

Look At This Satellite Map of The Walnut Grove, North Carolina Duke Energy Coal Ash Dumping Mess

Look At This Satellite Map of The Walnut Grove, North Carolina Duke Energy Coal Ash Dumping Mess

What Does Clean Coal Mean?

clean coal

The term "clean coal" is often used to refer to technologies and practices aimed at reducing the environmental impact of coal-fired power plants, particularly in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. 

Ocean Tidal Power Plant - Great Idea!
















FunFunding has just been secured to break ground on the world’s largest ocean current-driven power plant on the shores of Scotland. 

Exposure to Air Pollution Increases COVID-19 Deaths by 15%

Exposure to Air Pollution Increases COVID-19 Deaths by 15%

Long-term exposure to air pollution has been linked to an increased risk of dying from COVID-19 and, for the first time, a study has estimated the proportion of deaths from the coronavirus that could be attributed to the exacerbating effects of air pollution for every country in the world.

Salem, Virginia Roanoke County Coal Train Bridge Collapse Map

Salem, Virginia Roanoke County Coal Train Bridge Collapse Map

Officials from Roanoke County reacted in a press release Saturday night to the train derailment incident. 

Officials said a Norfolk Southern Corp. bridge collapsed around 11:15 p.m. on Friday night in Roanoke County near Barley Drive. While a coal-carrying train was crossing the Roanoke River, the bridge collapsed, and a dozen of the 22 derailed railcars fell into the river, causing around 2000 tons of coal to fall. 

According to the press release, the Virginia Department of Emergency and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality responded to the incident and organized the evacuation of the railcars and coal from the river.

Officials said that DEQ works with local, state, and federal agencies as well as Norfolk Southern to collect samples to assess if water quality has been compromised. 

Salem is now removing water from groundwater wells out of an abundance of caution and not the Roanoke River until it is possible to test water samples of the river, according to officials.

LADWP Hid Power Plant Methane Leak For Over A Year

For over a year, activists have been fighting to shut down the Department of Water and Power's Valley Generating Station in Los Angeles. Generating Station of the Valley, where red and white smokestacks tower over the San Fernando Valley's northeast corner. 

In late August, DWP employees first told the public and their own board of commissioners about the methane leak. During a Tuesday morning board meeting, Adams, the general manager of the utility, made the abrupt announcement, announcing that staff will present details about "a methane gas problem at Valley, and work that we are doing to regulate methane."

One staffer said the compressor units of the plant had been leaking gas "for the last couple of years." The utility had a plan in place to repair the compressors later in the year, but wanted to go public now because the leak was discovered as part of a drone survey by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and "their information is becoming more public," Adams told the board. 

There were some board members shocked. So were the elected officials. The concerns arose quickly: When did the workers discover the leak? Why wasn't the public informed earlier? How much of the plant's methane was leaking?

But the graffiti artist could have been almost anyone in a city burdened by hundreds of landfills, recycling centers, junkyards, trucking businesses, and other disruptive and polluting manufacturing facilities, and bisected by three major freeways. 

Sun Valley and Pacoima residents are breathing some of the worst air in California and suffering from hospitalizations due to asthma at rates much higher than most of the state. So the civic uproar was loud and fast when the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power announced last month that its power plant had been leaking methane gas for at least three years.

Here is a map of the Los Angeles Department of Water (LADWP) leaking methane.  Click on the map to browse other locations. 

Pacoima Beautiful an environmental organization that has been working to shut the power plant down for more than a year. Members claim that L.A.'s shift to cleaner sources of energy progresses too slowly and leaves behind their culture. 

The Valley Generating Station is seen by city leaders as a vital tool to keep the lights on when the sun is not shining and the wind is not blowing, at least before energy storage systems are cheaper and more flexible. 

There were comparisons to the Southern California Gas Co. Aliso Canyon gas spill, which spewed record-setting methane levels into the air around L.A.'s Porter Ranch neighborhood in late 2015 and early 2016. 

The Valley leak, in contrast, was tiny compared to Aliso Canyon's. At the next board meeting, staff presented slides showing that the defective compressors were leaking methane, the main natural gas part, at rates ranging from 168 to 367 kilograms per hour, readings from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory showed. At Aliso, the rate sometimes exceeded 50,000 kilograms an hour.

Community activists also do not believe that DWP gives them the complete story, especially because utility employees said they discovered the leak in August 2019, a full year earlier. Staffers said that because they didn't think anyone was at risk, they didn't alert the public. 

Except in enclosed spaces, methane itself is not harmful to human health. Yet natural gas also contains small quantities of benzene that causes cancer, and when burned, it releases lung-damaging nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds.

Evidence of health threats from living near oil and gas installations is starting to appear. A UC Berkeley-led study in July, for example, found that pregnant women living within six miles of oil and gas wells in rural California are much more likely to give birth to babies with low birth weights. And in Porter Ranch, years after the Aliso Canyon spill, people are still experiencing health concerns.

Last week, a committee of the City Council approved motions calling for DWP to faster repair leaks and install air-quality monitors near Valley Generating Station. A third motion, introduced on Tuesday, calls for the establishment of a trust fund for community services to support individuals living near the facility, with the intention of helping residents and schools purchase indoor air purifiers and air conditioners. 

DWP workers state the methane plume has not left the site of the power plant. And recent studies in the local community by the South Coast Air Quality Control District find levels of methane and volatile organic compounds "at normal background levels."

Full article on the LA Times.

Is It Save To Live Near A Nuclear Power Plant?


The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) has completed a groundbreaking ecological study of the impact of nuclear power plants on the local population. Despite large studies that say there is no evidence that people living near nuclear power plants are at increased risk of dying from cancer, the federal government is investigating the issue, starting with seven nuclear power plants in Connecticut and California. In a pilot project that will begin in the coming months, the NRC has commissioned the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a study on cancer risk.

The Office of Radiation Protection continuously monitors radioactivity and trains emergency workers in radiation emergencies. The Office for Radiation Protection monitors radiation levels in the air, water, and soil and continuously checks for radioactive substances and the presence of radioactive substances in air and water.
 
When an accident at a nuclear power plant is expected to release radiation into the area, local authorities activate warning sirens and approved alarms. Information and materials for emergencies can be obtained from the power plant operator, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), or the US Department of Energy. The area within a 10-mile radius of a plant typically includes areas within 1,000 feet of the reactor building or other facilities. If AI has not received information about the safety of people living within 10 miles of nuclear power plants, please contact your local Emergency Management Office.
 
Citizens living near a nuclear power plant must be regularly informed of procedures to inform them of problems at the plant and to take action when protective measures such as evacuation or shelter are required. This EPA fact sheet provides information for people living within a 10-mile radius or within a 10-mile radius of a reactor building or other facility, including how to respond in an emergency. It is an important resource for people, especially those living within ten miles of nuclear power plants and who may be exposed to radiation from nuclear power plants.
 
NPR wants to hear above all from the residents of a nuclear power plant about their experience with radiation pollution. We would like to hear from you at 800-989-8255 to learn more about your experience in the nuclear power plant environment.
 
We spoke to the National Academy of Sciences to remind them of the health studies they have conducted on nuclear power plants and their impact on public health and safety. This report continues to support the fact that US nuclear power plants do not affect public health and safety. It is not just a statistic that other children live near a nuclear power plant and get cancer.
 
We point out that coal-fired power stations release 100 times more radioactivity than nuclear power stations, and there is data showing that people living near a coal-fired power station are at a higher risk of cancer than those not living near the power station. Studies show that the amount of radioactive material released in operated coal-fired power plants is the same as in nuclear power plants. We quote a study by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which states that 'coal-fired power plants have released up to 100,000 tonnes of radioactive waste per year, or more than the total amount of radiation emitted by an operational power plant in the US.
 
The COMARE report contrasts this with a German study which calls for an increase in the risk of leukemia and other cancers in people living near nuclear power stations. The estimated radiation dose that people take in near coal-fired power plants is about twice as high as that of nuclear power plants or coal-fired power plants. However, a study by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found no significant difference in cancer risk between people with cancer and those who do not live in close proximity to nuclear and coal-fired power plants. In fact, the risk of childhood leukemia in areas with high radiation exposure, such as the United States and Germany, has roughly doubled, according to the CDC.
 
Ten years after the leak began, a person living near the plant was twice as likely to get cancer as someone living elsewhere in the U.S. The latest report by COMARE examined the health of children under the age of 5 living near 13 British nuclear power stations. Such studies deal with radiation exposure to the surrounding population, not just the nuclear power plant itself.
 
Nuclear power stations are built according to certain regulations, so the energy costs are lower when you grow up there. District heating near a nuclear power plant is, however, much more expensive than in other parts of the US and Canada. For example, the first nuclear power plant in the United States, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, was shut down in 1971.
 
The closure has led to an increase in the number of people living closer to the power plant, as proximity to the plant is linked to employment in the vicinity of the power plant. The other part, of course, is how many jobs they create over time, but I ask you to think about how important they are to meet the nation's electricity needs in the years ahead. Is it safe to live near a nuclear power plant, especially if you live in a city with a high concentration of nuclear power plants, such as New York City?