
Why pair AC adoption with outage rankings?
Air conditioning is a health necessity in heat waves, reducing heat-related illness and mortality. But AC also drives peak electricity demand on the hottest afternoons, exactly when equipment and lines are stressed and weather extremes are most intense. When an outage hits during a heat event, risk multiplies: indoor temperatures rise quickly, medical devices lose power, food spoils, and essential communications falter. Understanding where high cooling demand overlaps with frequent outages helps utilities, regulators, and households target solutions—from grid hardening and vegetation management to home batteries and community cooling centers. America is cooling down by powering up. Nearly all households in many states now rely on air conditioning during increasingly intense summer heat. Yet the places most dependent on AC are often the same places where grid interruptions are rising. This long-form analysis pairs air-conditioning adoption with a 50-state ranking of power outage burden to highlight where comfort and vulnerability collide—and where grid resilience and backup planning matter most.
How to read the ranking
The table below orders states from highest overall outage burden (Rank 1) to lowest (Rank 50). “Outage burden” reflects long-run counts of major weather-related outages, the scale of customers affected, and the persistence of reliability problems reported across seasons. This approach prioritizes where households are repeatedly exposed to disruptive events, not just a single headline-grabbing storm. For a national perspective on the underlying trend—more extreme weather driving more outages—see Climate Central’s reporting on weather-related power disruptions.
U.S. States Ranked by Power Outage Frequency
Highest burden High Moderate Lower
Rank | State | Burden Tier | Why it’s here (short version) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Texas | Highest | Frequent, large-scale weather outages (heat, storms, ice), huge customer exposure. |
2 | Michigan | Highest | Recurrent severe-storm disruptions, vegetation & aging infrastructure challenges. |
3 | California | Highest | Wildfire risk and public safety shutoffs; large population exposed. |
4 | North Carolina | High | Hurricanes and severe storms affect both coast and inland areas. |
5 | Ohio | High | Severe weather & storms; repeated multi-county events. |
6 | Pennsylvania | High | Nor’easters, thunderstorms, and tree density driving outages. |
7 | New York | High | Nor’easters, tropical remnants, dense urban & suburban load. |
8 | Georgia | High | Thunderstorms, hurricanes, and rapid growth straining assets. |
9 | Virginia | High | Storm tracks plus wooded distribution corridors. |
10 | Tennessee | High | Wind, ice, and convective storms produce recurring events. |
11 | Florida | High | Hurricanes and tropical systems; high AC dependence at peak. |
12 | Louisiana | High | Hurricanes and flooding with longer restoration windows. |
13 | Kentucky | High | Severe storms, ice, and tree fall events. |
14 | Alabama | High | Convective storms and hurricanes impacting Gulf and inland. |
15 | Indiana | High | Thunderstorms, wind, and seasonal severe weather. |
16 | Missouri | High | Strong convective systems and winter storms. |
17 | Oklahoma | High | Wind, ice, and severe convective outbreaks. |
18 | Arkansas | High | Severe weather corridor; vegetation exposure. |
19 | Illinois | Moderate | Thunderstorms and derecho risk, high population exposure. |
20 | South Carolina | Moderate | Hurricane and thunderstorm activity statewide. |
21 | Maryland | Moderate | Nor’easters and summer storms; dense suburban networks. |
22 | New Jersey | Moderate | Coastal storms and wind events impacting dense corridors. |
23 | Mississippi | Moderate | Gulf storms and inland thunderstorm tracks. |
24 | Minnesota | Moderate | Winter storms and summer squall lines. |
25 | Wisconsin | Moderate | Wind/ice events and thunderstorm complexes. |
26 | Iowa | Moderate | Derechos and strong convective lines across the plains. |
27 | Kansas | Moderate | Wind and thunderstorm activity; wide rural networks. |
28 | Colorado | Moderate | Wind, snow, and summer thunderstorms; wildfire impacts. |
29 | Arizona | Moderate | Monsoon winds & dust, extreme heat stressing distribution. |
30 | New Mexico | Moderate | Monsoon storms, lightning, and wildfire seasons. |
31 | Oregon | Moderate | Windstorms, wildfire public-safety shutoffs in select corridors. |
32 | Washington | Moderate | Wind, winter storms; lower AC adoption but rising heat risk. |
33 | West Virginia | Moderate | Mountain weather and tree exposure; frequent smaller events. |
34 | Nevada | Lower | Localized wind and heat stress; lower large-event counts. |
35 | Utah | Lower | Wind and winter storms; generally fewer major events. |
36 | Nebraska | Lower | Severe storms and ice, but lower statewide totals. |
37 | Montana | Lower | Winter storms and wind with sparse population exposure. |
38 | Idaho | Lower | Wind, snow, and some wildfire shutoff potential. |
39 | Wyoming | Lower | Wind and winter weather; low population density. |
40 | North Dakota | Lower | Winter storms; fewer large-scale outage events. |
41 | South Dakota | Lower | Thunderstorms and winter events with smaller totals. |
42 | Delaware | Lower | Coastal storms but limited geographic spread. |
43 | Connecticut | Lower | Nor’easters and wind; fewer major multi-state events. |
44 | Massachusetts | Lower | Coastal storms and nor’easters; urban redundancy helps. |
45 | New Hampshire | Lower | Winter weather; lower totals relative to population. |
46 | Rhode Island | Lower | Coastal wind and storms; compact grid footprint. |
47 | Vermont | Lower | Ice and wind; low population exposure. |
48 | Maine | Lower | Frequent smaller events, but fewer major multi-state outages. |
49 | Hawaii | Lower | Tropical systems and volcanic hazards; isolated grid. |
50 | Alaska | Lower | Harsh weather on a dispersed system; few major national events. |
† For national trend context on weather-driven outage growth, see Climate Central’s overview of weather-related power outages.
What the pairing reveals
1) High cooling dependence + high outage exposure
States in the Southeast and southern Great Plains—Texas, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, South Carolina—combine nearly universal AC usage with recurring severe-weather outages. In these places, timing matters most: a utility interruption at 4 p.m. in August is costlier and riskier than one at 2 a.m. in March. Home backup power, targeted feeder upgrades, and robust vegetation management on key circuits can shave the steepest risks.
2) Rapidly rising heat risk in historically cool regions
Air-conditioning adoption has lagged in the Pacific Northwest and parts of New England, yet heatwaves are expanding. States like Washington, Oregon, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine will likely see both AC installations and peak loads climb. Even if large-event outage counts remain lower than hurricane-prone regions, communities unaccustomed to prolonged heat deserve extra attention for cooling centers and targeted resilience investments.
3) Wildfire shutoffs reshape the outage map
California illustrates how risk mitigation can cause widespread, planned outages. Public safety power shutoffs (PSPS) reduce ignition risk but increase indoor heat exposure and economic loss during hot, dry, windy days. Microgrids at critical facilities—water pumps, hospitals, emergency communications, grocery distribution hubs—can bridge this gap while broader system upgrades continue.
4) Vegetation & aging infrastructure
Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Indiana, and Kentucky appear high in our ranking not because of coastal hurricanes but because of repeated severe thunderstorms, ice, and heavy tree exposure along older distribution corridors. Trimming schedules, automated reclosers, and hardened poles/lines can reduce both the number of customers affected and the duration of events.
Action steps for states and households
- Targeted grid hardening: prioritize feeders serving dense, AC-dependent neighborhoods and critical services (hospitals, senior housing, telecom hubs).
- Peak management: time-of-use rates, thermostat orchestration, and demand response lower the strain during heat spikes.
- Distributed resilience: home batteries, solar-plus-storage, and community microgrids keep essential loads powered through outages.
- Cooling centers & communications: map and publicize locations with backup power; send multilingual alerts before heat and wind events.
- Data transparency: consistent reporting of reliability metrics (SAIDI/SAIFI, customers affected, restoration times) helps residents and local officials assess progress.
About the AC side of the story
In the South and much of the Midwest, household AC adoption exceeds 90%, with central cooling dominant. In coastal Pacific Northwest and parts of northern New England, adoption has been significantly lower but is rising fast as heat risk spreads. For methodology and historical patterns, see the EIA’s detailed residential consumption and equipment surveys, which remain the most authoritative window into household AC by region and state cluster.